Labour politician delivers inaugural Rita Hinden Memorial Lecture on how to tackle the challenges of Big Tech, democratic disillusionment and online disinformation.
By Eve Lacroix (Senior Communications Officer), Published (Updated )
“Labour mustn’t lose. The choice is social democracy or the bros,” warned Dr Anneliese Dodds MP at the Rita Hinden Memorial Lecture hosted at City St George’s, University of London.
The lecture was organised by the journal Renewal: A Journal of Social Democracy and the Finsbury Institute, a hub for policy and research at City St George’s.
Dr Lise Butler, Senior Lecturer in Modern History and co-editor of Renewal, hosted the event, which opened with remarks from Professor Diana Beech, Director of the Finsbury Institute, and Dr David Klemperer of Renewal.
Dodds outlined the dangers facing social democracy in an age of populism and Big Tech. She urged Labour to “act to protect our fragile democracy,” warning that complacency after Labour’s 2024 landslide would be dangerous. Far-right movements continue to reshape politics, with their globally connected anti-democratic activists and politicians currently meeting little organised resistance.
Dodds revisited Must Labour Lose?, the 1960 pamphlet co-authored by Rita Hinden after Labour’s third successive defeat, in which the social democratic and internationalist activist Hinden argued that waning class loyalties demanded new strategies.
Dodds drew a parallel to today’s fractured electorate.
“We're currently experiencing a change to British society and politics that I believe is just as momentous as a reduction in class-based political affiliation that Hinden and her coauthors analysed”, she said. “Far from number 10, Nigel Farage has been amassing power in the sprawling networked space for 21st century politics happens. That power involves, I would argue, a new fusion, a melding of the economic and the political power of big tech.”
Some social media platforms can now influence elections, information flows and public trust. The “bros” who run them are often interested in profit-driven power, and increasingly aligning with the populist right.
“Delivering more stuff - better services, more money in people’s pockets - is critical but not enough,” Dodds argued. Instead, she argued that Labour has to adapt at “lightning speed” to the new world of politics.
She said:
Dodds outlined specific steps for a Labour government, such as strengthening the Online Safety Act and providing genuine transparency around how significant incidents, especially during election periods will be handled.
“Government must recognise that big tech is often a monopoly and treat it as such,” she added.
As for the use of AI, she spelled out the transformational opportunities from AI, but also highlighted the problems with failing to manage its use - for employment, for fairness and for social trust.
“The promotion of innovation must come with a purpose, with incentives to support the public good” she said. She also said that “I predict that the treatment of citizens, including as service users by AI tools will become an increasingly contentious area of public policy. If bureaucracy has become increasingly and literally faceless, people's suspicion of government could grow deeper still.”
Dodds linked these concerns to Labour’s intellectual traditions. Just as Hinden engaged with the decline of class politics, today’s party must engage with digital capitalism. She argued that Labour’s challenge is not just to govern effectively but to restore democratic trust in a society reshaped by technology.