The City Law School welcomed the lawyer, campaigner, life peer and privy counsellor to deliver the inaugural Academic Programmes Public Lecture.
By Dr Shamim Quadir (Senior Communications Officer), Published
On Thursday 23 October, The City Law School, City St George’s, University of London, welcomed The Rt Hon. the Baroness Shami Chakrabarti CBE PC to deliver the inaugural Academic Programmes Public Lecture about her book, Human Rights: The Case for the Defence.
Baroness Chakrabarti is a human rights lawyer, campaigner, life peer (Labour) and privy counsellor. She was previously the director of Liberty (formally the National Council for Civil Liberties) from 2003 to 2016 and the Shadow Attorney General from 2016 until 2020. She is also a Master of the Bench of the Middle Temple and carried the Olympic Flag at the London Games in 2012.
Professor Mark O’Brien, Deputy Dean of the School, began proceedings with a special acknowledgement of all the London Borough of Lewisham secondary school students in attendance in the audience, thanking them for taking what he felt could be an important step toward many of them studying at the School in the future.
In his wide ranging, opening remarks introducing Baroness Chakrabarti, he outlined the impact of her years in service to date. Sharing in part:
Human rights ‘in the dock’
Baroness Chakrabarti began her talk by remarking on the current breakdown of the global consensus on the universality of human rights. With skeptic voices being found on the political left as well as right, though with the commonality of nationalism, sharing:
She also clarified how very few rights are absolute. While right to life and right to not be tortured are absolute, most rights lie in balance to others or are qualified.
Baroness Chakrabarti discussed a variety of topical themes as they appear in her book:
She addresses the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) across a number of chapters, including Chapter 5. Modern Prometheus; the title a reference to the Mary Shelley novel, Frankenstein. An allusion to AI being a new creation that we do not fully understand and may not be able to control.
She expressed a major concern of AI being its ‘black box’ nature and not knowing what is going inside. For example, how would we know whose faces are being prioritised and searched for in police live facial recognition technologies.
Baroness Chakrabarti commented on AI use in recruitment decision making, and the idea of a near future where one may have to demand the right to a human decision about one’s suitability for employment.
She also touched upon discussing in Chapter 6. War and Peace the complementary actions of the 1949 Geneva Conventions with human rights law. For example, the Geneva Conventions prohibit torture, but it is human rights law that defines what torture is.
In concluding her talk, she reminded her audience to just pick up her book, even if for only specific points of interest in some chapters. It fits easily in a pocket and is written for everyone even vaguely interested in human rights – not just those with a specialist interest in the field of human rights law.
In conversation
Sitting down in conversation with Professor Dimitrios Giannoulopoulos, Head of Department (Academic Programmes) at the School, Baroness Chakrabarti reflected on the all too commonplace misunderstanding of human rights by the media. Likewise, the need for allyship in human rights if, in the near future, the UK government does swing to the populist right.
She agreed with Professor Giannoulopoulos, from his experience of educating in schools, that young people do ‘get’ human rights and that if informed about and framed correctly, the wider public do at heart support human rights too; it is the framing by politicians and the media which can get in the way.
Within the distressing context of current world politics, Baroness Chakrabarti reminded her audience that the moment is not at all hopeless. She advised anyone wanting to find ways of staying positive in our world of 24 hour media cycles and smartphones to yes, stay engaged – but not too much – sharing:
The event concluded with a very thoughtful Q&A session with the audience.
Reflecting on the event, Professor Giannoulopoulos said:
He added: